<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pistrician supersiliation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://codepoetics.com/poetix/2007/04/30/pistrician-supersiliation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://codepoetics.com/poetix/2007/04/30/pistrician-supersiliation/</link>
	<description>better than fun</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 19:03:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Love and Terrorism</title>
		<link>http://codepoetics.com/poetix/2007/04/30/pistrician-supersiliation/comment-page-1/#comment-23676</link>
		<dc:creator>Love and Terrorism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 17:06:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codepoetics.com/poetix/?p=400#comment-23676</guid>
		<description>My response to the film is at my site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My response to the film is at my site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://codepoetics.com/poetix/2007/04/30/pistrician-supersiliation/comment-page-1/#comment-23337</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 20:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codepoetics.com/poetix/?p=400#comment-23337</guid>
		<description>More here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wesley</title>
		<link>http://codepoetics.com/poetix/2007/04/30/pistrician-supersiliation/comment-page-1/#comment-23332</link>
		<dc:creator>Wesley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 14:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codepoetics.com/poetix/?p=400#comment-23332</guid>
		<description>I agree that masculinism is nihilistic, though for me it&#039;s because masculinism is identical to belief in the Law, and in the end the Law is always nihilistic, because it&#039;s founded on the prohibition of the object that it enjoys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that masculinism is nihilistic, though for me it&#8217;s because masculinism is identical to belief in the Law, and in the end the Law is always nihilistic, because it&#8217;s founded on the prohibition of the object that it enjoys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wesley</title>
		<link>http://codepoetics.com/poetix/2007/04/30/pistrician-supersiliation/comment-page-1/#comment-23331</link>
		<dc:creator>Wesley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 14:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codepoetics.com/poetix/?p=400#comment-23331</guid>
		<description>What does &#039;manliness&#039;  mean? I agree that masculinism is nihilistic, though for me it&#039;s because masculinism is identical to belief in the Law, and in the end the Law is always nihilistic, because it&#039;s founded on the prohibition of the object that it enjoys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What does &#8216;manliness&#8217;  mean? I agree that masculinism is nihilistic, though for me it&#8217;s because masculinism is identical to belief in the Law, and in the end the Law is always nihilistic, because it&#8217;s founded on the prohibition of the object that it enjoys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wesley</title>
		<link>http://codepoetics.com/poetix/2007/04/30/pistrician-supersiliation/comment-page-1/#comment-23330</link>
		<dc:creator>Wesley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 13:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codepoetics.com/poetix/?p=400#comment-23330</guid>
		<description>sorry about the name changes, it&#039;s not deliberate, it keeps reverting back to default setting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry about the name changes, it&#8217;s not deliberate, it keeps reverting back to default setting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: loveandterrorism</title>
		<link>http://codepoetics.com/poetix/2007/04/30/pistrician-supersiliation/comment-page-1/#comment-23328</link>
		<dc:creator>loveandterrorism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 13:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codepoetics.com/poetix/?p=400#comment-23328</guid>
		<description>Holy shit, jinx! Buy me a coke!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Holy shit, jinx! Buy me a coke!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: loveandterrorism</title>
		<link>http://codepoetics.com/poetix/2007/04/30/pistrician-supersiliation/comment-page-1/#comment-23327</link>
		<dc:creator>loveandterrorism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 13:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codepoetics.com/poetix/?p=400#comment-23327</guid>
		<description>I think that perversion is the masculine nihilistic form, but I&#039;m interested in whether the film&#039;s &#039;masculinist nihilism&#039; perversely enjoys masculinity as a &#039;no-thing&#039;, or whether it produces/constitutes this real space of nothing.

 I guess that the form of seduction is the closest thing to feminine nihilism, though seduction, unlike perversion, suspends the Law that constitutes the nothingness that provides the integral object of nihilistic belief.   

 In any case, your piece makes the film sound bloody (and) hot! I see it tomorrow evening, after teaching, nice and tired, and in the perfect mood to enjoy the evident meaninglessness of this escapist fantasy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that perversion is the masculine nihilistic form, but I&#8217;m interested in whether the film&#8217;s &#8216;masculinist nihilism&#8217; perversely enjoys masculinity as a &#8216;no-thing&#8217;, or whether it produces/constitutes this real space of nothing.</p>
<p> I guess that the form of seduction is the closest thing to feminine nihilism, though seduction, unlike perversion, suspends the Law that constitutes the nothingness that provides the integral object of nihilistic belief.   </p>
<p> In any case, your piece makes the film sound bloody (and) hot! I see it tomorrow evening, after teaching, nice and tired, and in the perfect mood to enjoy the evident meaninglessness of this escapist fantasy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dominic</title>
		<link>http://codepoetics.com/poetix/2007/04/30/pistrician-supersiliation/comment-page-1/#comment-23326</link>
		<dc:creator>Dominic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 13:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codepoetics.com/poetix/?p=400#comment-23326</guid>
		<description>To put it another way: at the extreme towards which Miller tends, masculinism is nihilistic because it proposes a purification without end: everything &quot;unmanly&quot; has to go, but because manliness is a phantom this inevitably ends up in a death cult, a purge of life itself (all crimes are, after all, committed by the living...I mean, all &lt;em&gt;crimesss&lt;/em&gt;...). Mass slaughter as purification, as the affirmation of a hard &quot;kernel&quot; of allegedly emancipatory discipline...I mean, I think, &quot;no thanks&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To put it another way: at the extreme towards which Miller tends, masculinism is nihilistic because it proposes a purification without end: everything &#8220;unmanly&#8221; has to go, but because manliness is a phantom this inevitably ends up in a death cult, a purge of life itself (all crimes are, after all, committed by the living&#8230;I mean, all <em>crimesss</em>&#8230;). Mass slaughter as purification, as the affirmation of a hard &#8220;kernel&#8221; of allegedly emancipatory discipline&#8230;I mean, I think, &#8220;no thanks&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dominic</title>
		<link>http://codepoetics.com/poetix/2007/04/30/pistrician-supersiliation/comment-page-1/#comment-23321</link>
		<dc:creator>Dominic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 11:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codepoetics.com/poetix/?p=400#comment-23321</guid>
		<description>That whole Frank Miller thing, really. Theweleit has (I&#039;m told) the goods.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That whole Frank Miller thing, really. Theweleit has (I&#8217;m told) the goods.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wesley</title>
		<link>http://codepoetics.com/poetix/2007/04/30/pistrician-supersiliation/comment-page-1/#comment-23320</link>
		<dc:creator>Wesley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 10:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codepoetics.com/poetix/?p=400#comment-23320</guid>
		<description>Can you be more explicit about what you mean by &#039;masculinist nihilism&#039; in the film?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you be more explicit about what you mean by &#8216;masculinist nihilism&#8217; in the film?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
